Why Explicit Female Sexuality will Lose Its Appeal

We're supposed to salivate in lust when a woman engages in any kind of sexual behavior in public. Not for long.



I was watching Stand-up comedy from Ron White yesterday.  This stand-up  to be specific.



I've always found this guy to be hilarious. I first saw him as part of the Blue Collar Comedy Tour- a showcase of redneck comedians. His material is good and his laid-back delivery is classic. During part of his standup he talked about how at a prior show, there was a bachelorette party sitting in the front row. They were getting drunk and messing around. At some point, they took this chocolate dildo from their table and were competing to see which could deep-throat it the furthest. White was saying how the audience shifted from him to them; with the girls going "You go Girl" (or something like that) and guys were going "Is this free?". Clearly, the guys were mesmerized.

Female sexuality has its allure because it's so carefully hidden. When you think about it, there's nothing that special about a vagina or even their utters, I mean tits. It's just that we don't see them often, and women historically have done a good job of making them a non-issue in daily interaction (with some exceptions to gain leverage). By guarding female sexuality so tightly, they've enhanced its perceived value. Make no mistake, our male genetics have a natural urge towards female sexuality for obvious reasons, but women enhance this innate drive by making it seem as though their sexuality is kept securely in a bank vault (PUAs find out these barriers aren't nearly as thief-proof as advertised).

But what happens when women flaunt their sexuality? Miley Cyrus' VMA performance was met with disgust; and not just from the usual moralists.



It's as though female sexuality has jumped the shark. We've seen enough. What we actually want is women to be demure in public, and share their sexuality (their prize) with us in private. This has been summarize in myriad ways, IE: "Lady in the street, freak in the sheets". When a woman is a freak in public, she has cheapened her primary asset. Female sexuality is now not this cherished prize, whispered about - but something "common" and offered to the average passerby at no cost. Men don't want to be the 100th man to see a woman exercise her oral technique. ll too often, the modern woman is an attention-whoring freak in public, and a dud in bed - having little actual ability apparently except to lower her standing in public to be "in the spotlight" for a few minutes. Her sexuality has become a tool for her short-term benefit, and not long term value (benefitting her man). She focuses on only that which aids the former.

Naturally, fat feminist f*ck-ups who've failed in all ways, decry this as "angel/***** dichotomy" (notice: men perceive feminists as neither). 3rd wave feminism is about 'owning' female sexuality- which in practice, means cheapening it; because when women "own" something, they will end up using it in self-centered ways and for short-term interest = attention-whoring. They don't think long term. If they did, they'd realize they're eroding the specialness of female sexuality. And they're removing the primary sexual appeal men have towards women, which is that they, and they alone are treated to the female sexuality of a pristine, upstanding woman. Hard to take pride of your woman's technique, when everyone at the Ron White show already knows what that's about.

Men in part fall in love with this noble female sexuality. For the cheap, public kind they will gladly court the woman for sex, and then disappear. Misuse of sexuality by women is the primary reason they are largely pumped and dumped today, but cultivate no long-term connection with the men they date. But so long as male horndogs, who are equally incapable of managing their animal nature, reward women for this behavior, we will continue to encourage the wrong behavior and lower the long-term happiness and satisfaction of men and women alike. With PUAs exploiting the short-term, MGTOWs sitting out, elites regaling in the confusion, and women being totally clueless, that leaves only tradcons and moralists- who have the right ideas but totally ineffectual arguments and can't reach anyone but "true believers".

To be blunt, the average imbecile lacks the ability to think long-term; the people need long-term lifestyle guidance- and with mainstream religion receding from the culture, due to lack of credibility, there is no one to provide it.