Men aren't attracted to Gender-Neutral Women

The modern woman can be described as "gender neutral" because even though she is technically a female, she clearly doesn't embrace her gender.

Instead, she is inspired by outside forces to mimic masculinity in hopes of one days rivaling or surpassing men. In such a way, she doesn't 'transcend' her female nature but rather throws it away.

When the mass media feverishly reports the dropping marriage rate, they will plumb each and every phony and partial reason ranging from supposed economic issues (which for some reason, never stopped people from marrying in the past) or the fact that people are "waiting" longer (is it too late to consider tying the knot for an 80-year old woman with six cats?), none will report the fact that men cannot develop deep attraction to this generation of women whose masculine tendencies aped from television portrayals of heroines, wrongheaded instruction from their mangina fathers, and from the workplace fall outside the natural range of attraction to men.

Such women at best can be treated as holes or slots and accessed on a temporary basis as many of us have been involved in the hookup culture or dating, but make awful, adversarial long-term partners and are left on the shelves "unsold".

Asian women constitute one partial exception (and I realize not all, not by a longshot) who at least embrace their femininity. In contrast, the American white woman has gone from being desired worldwide to a laughingstock that hardly any population of men WW are attracted to.

Though feminism and feminine sound awfully similar, they are worlds apart. Asian women become desirable wherever they go, owing to this difference (though beware, appearances are deceiving). American woman draw guffaws from men everywhere also for this difference.

The "gender neutral" woman walks with her chin up. She has male body posture. She seeks ways to blunt her femininity by wearing short hair. She reduces effort into her appearance - made famous by the sloppy look of most American women. She is overweight...and PROUD of it!

There are a few women who still have the "magic" left but they are a dwindling number. A larger number retain the outward feminine appearance but internally retain an adversarial attitude towards men.

And this is what causes even many PUAs to give up on their craft because even physical attraction melts in the face of an ornery female with the attributes of the most obnoxious men; where corralling her requires answering sh*t-test after sh*t-test which melts any true or deep attraction to her - at best she can be f*cked and forgotten.

Society and women vastly underestimate just how attracted we are to soft, pleasant female personalities; how much of our true interest in them owes to this factor, which is so sadly underplayed in our culture today. Conversely, how disinterested we are when women do the opposite.

Women have little room to complain. Would women be attracted to a "gender-neutral" man- a man who demonstrated female tendencies? Would they be attracted to a man who was shy, who was reluctant to assert himself, who was bashful, who had a limp-wrist, who cried when someone yelled loudly, who needed constant emotional reassurance? No. So why should men be attracted to women with masculine qualities?

Feminism bleats that women can "be anything". And they can. But to the extent that "anything" deviates from the kind, constructive, pleasant personality that men deeply want in a woman, their choices will have consequences. This consequence being that they are totally shunned for a long term relationship by 3.5 billion males on planet Earth.

I should add that the primary change in relationships is the reduction of LTRs. If you look at the rates of sex, they remain similar to past levels. If you look at the indicators of commitment (marriage), that's declined. As it is, p*ssies haven't changed. They still provide whatever value they did in the past. It's the mind that's attached to the p*ssy that feminism has changed, or rather untethered from traditionalist guidance. So when the standard man interviewed in a newspaper article says he can't marry his GF because "economic times are tough" or "we haven't saved enough money" he is merely giving a surface level reason. In truth, he has apprehended that his GF provides sexual value but would be a poor LTR. In fact, the only way to secure her sexual value is to not get married. We have had economic difficulty before- the last 15 years are nowhere near the worst we've seen. Given what I just mentioned though, I believe we are also getting to the point where a woman's personality may even dampen the interest in p*ssy and what we've seen in Japan with herbivores, we may see in the West to some degree.